Doe v. State of California

Case Information

Full Name : Jane Doe, a minor, by John Doe, her guardian ad litem; and Jason Roe, a minor, by David Roe, his guardian ad litem, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated public school students in the State of California v. The State of California; Tom Torlakson, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction; the California Department of Education; the State Board of Education; and Does 1 through 100 inclusive

Case Number : BC445151

Court : Los Angeles Superior Court of California

Judge : Hon. Kenneth R. Freeman

Co-Counsel : ACLU of Northern California; ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties; Morrison & Foerster LLP

Since its adoption in 1879, Article IX, Section 5 of the California Constitution has required that the State provide a system of free public schools.  In 1984, the California Supreme Court ruled unequivocally in Hartzell v. Connell that public schools cannot charge students or families any fees as a condition for participating in “educational programs,” including both curricular and extracurricular activities.  As the result of an investigation that uncovered more than 50 public school districts in which at least one high school openly acknowledges on its website that students must pay fees in order to participate in educational programs, the ACLU filed suit in September 2010 against the State of California and the Governor seeking to compel the State to establish a system for monitoring school districts and ensuring they comply with the California Constitution’s free schools clause.


Case Developments

March 1, 2013

Due to AB 1575, you may now file a complaint at your school if you have been charged an illegal fee.  Learn how to file a complaint with your school.

October 1, 2012

The ACLU announced that it will dismiss the lawsuit as a result of the passage of AB 1575. Read more.

September 29, 2012

Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1575, a bill authored by Assemblymember Ricardo Lara and sponsored by the ACLU of California, which establishes a statewide accountability system for illegal school fees and ensures that the State provides regular legal guidance to school districts on the requirement of a free public education.

January 26, 2012

The Court rejected the Defendants’ arguments that the case should be dismissed, ruling that the State is ultimately responsible for fundamental educational rights and that our claims should proceed to trial. Read more about the ruling.

April 7, 2011

Complaint was amended once to include new parties after the defendants stated they were not interested in settlement.

September 10, 2010

When the ACLU filed the suit, it released “Pay to Learn,” a report documenting the numerous school districts that were openly charging illegal school fees. Read more about the suit.