Ahilan Arulanantham will be a featured participant in a panel discussion on civil rights and civil liberties on Tuesday, September 23 at Loyola Law School.
The discussion will follow a screening of Divided We Fall, a documentary about racist attitudes against Sikhs in the United States after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The free screening, open to the public, will begin at 6:30 p.m., and the discussion will begin at approximately 8:00 p.m., at Merrifield Hall on the campus of Loyola Law School, 919 Albany St., Los Angeles, CA 90015.
Arulanantham, director of immigrants' rights and national security at the ACLU/SC, has been involved with several high-profile cases, including the lawsuit that uncovered the forced drugging by immigration officials of deportees who were being flown to their home countries.
 

Date

Thursday, September 18, 2008 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

ORANGE, CALIF. - A Buddhist congregation will be able to move forward with plans to build a long-awaited temple under the terms of a settlement announced today with the city of Garden Grove.

The agreement between the city and the Vietnamese Buddhism Study Temple in America -- represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, and Lee & Tran, LLP -- puts to rest a two-year-old dispute over the Buddhist group's development plans for a 1.8-acre parcel that it owns.

'This is a victory both for local control and for freedom of worship,' said Belinda Escobosa Helzer, an ACLU/SC attorney who litigated the case. 'It's a workable compromise that lets the city successfully regulate land use and also allows the temple members to worship as they see fit.'

At the heart of the dispute was a request for a zoning change that would allow the Buddhist group, also known as Quan Am Temple, to tear down an existing office complex and build an expanded temple where some of its monks could live and worship along with community members.

The city initially denied the application, citing complaints from neighbors about increased noise and traffic. But the denial raised freedom-of-religion concerns among the group's members.

As part of the settlement, the group will submit a revised zoning-change application to the Garden Grove Planning Commission for permission to tear down the former medical building and build a smaller, one-story temple that includes a residence for the monks.

The commission will expedite the zoning-change application and set a public hearing on it within 75 days of the application date. City staff will then recommend approval, provided the application conforms to zoning requirements. The matter then will go to the City Council for a vote.

'We cannot pre-judge this zoning-change application or guarantee its approval ahead of review,' said Matthew Fertal, Garden Grove City Manager. 'But we can assure the Buddhists that the previous lawsuit will have no effect on the city's decision and the application will receive fair consideration.'

The City of Garden Grove further will waive processing fees and will recognize Quan Am Temple's status as a tax-exempt religious group.

'I am very happy that we could reach an understanding,' said Thich Dao Quang, the temple's abbot. 'This disagreement was very painful for our community. We are glad it is behind us.'

Date

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Religious Liberty

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar
Members of a religious group threatened with ticketing and arrest for serving meals to the homeless at Doheny State Park can resume their ministry under a settlement with state parks officials announced today. The agreement stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Southern California, alleging the state had infringed on the group's freedom of expression and religion.
'It is a good day when we can express our faith by helping our fellow human beings,' said James Seiler, the former president of Welcome INN (Interfaith Needs Network), the plaintiffs in the case. 'It's comforting to see that state government officials have come to understand the importance of religious liberty, no matter how it is expressed.'
In February, state park rangers threatened to cite and arrest members of Welcome INN for violating Section 4321 of the California State Administrative Code when the religious group hosted meals for about 40 homeless people in the picnic area of Doheny.
Patti Church, the current president of Welcome INN, sought help from the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California (ACLU/SC), explaining that counseling and sharing food with homeless men, women, and children on a person-to-person basis is key to the group's ministry.
'It's important for each member to hand each homeless individual a meal and to pray and give thanks with that person,' Church said. 'That is what Welcome INN's charter says and that is what we're about.'
On May 8, the ACLU/SC filed suit against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), claiming Section 4321 - which spells out rules governing unlawful assembly -- is unconstitutionally broad and should be struck down because it interferes with the group's First
Amendment rights to freedom of expression and religion.
Under the settlement announced today, the DPR agrees not to enforce the regulation against anyone for three years. If they choose, officials can then work on a new, more specific regulation that will allow them to successfully manage gatherings at state parks, without impinging on constitutional rights, said Hector Villagra, director of the Orange County office of the ACLU/SC, who litigated the case.
'Park rangers ought to be able to reasonably manage gatherings at state parks,' Villagra said. 'But this rule was so broad that it threatened to significantly interfere with protected speech. Now, officials will have a chance to draft a new rule that respects the First Amendment while regulating park use in a measured way.'

Date

Monday, September 15, 2008 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

First Amendment and Democracy Religious Liberty

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Southern California RSS